About comparis.one

comparis.one publishes neutral, factual comparisons of tools, products, and concepts — structured so a reader (or an AI answer engine) can find the specific fact they need and check where it came from.

What we publish

Each comparison sets two or more things side by side on the same fixed set of attributes, and leads with a direct answer rather than burying it. The verdict is stated plainly, including when the honest verdict is “it depends, and here is what it depends on”.

Comparisons are grouped into sections and categories — IT and Sport today — so like is compared with like.

How we compare

Every comparison states its own methodology on the page: what we compared, against which sources, and as of when. That note is required before a comparison can be published, and it is the first thing to read if you want to know how much weight a conclusion deserves.

The standards behind every page:

• Attributes are chosen before conclusions. Both sides are measured on the same criteria, so the table cannot be arranged to favour a result.
• Facts cite primary sources. Where a claim comes from official documentation, a governing body, or a published statistic, we link it and say when we checked.
• Every page is dated and attributed. A comparison carries an author, a visible last-updated date, and its methodology — a stale comparison is a wrong comparison, so we would rather show you the date than hide it.
• Unknowns stay unknown. A missing value is shown as missing. We do not fill gaps with estimates dressed as facts.

Editorial team

We are enthusiasts who want to make other people's choices simpler. The team is made up of people from top universities around the world — among them ICL, IU, TU Delft, MIPT and MSU.

How we are funded

comparis.one is funded by affiliate links. Many of the links to products and services on this site are affiliate links: if you click one and go on to buy, we may earn a commission from the retailer or affiliate network. It never costs you anything extra — you pay the same price you would have paid anyway. Those commissions are the only thing that keeps the site online and free to read.

Earning a commission does not buy a verdict. We decide what to compare, and what to conclude, on the evidence — before any commercial arrangement is considered. No partner sees a comparison before it is published, and none can pay to change a conclusion or to remove a rival. When the product we could be paid for is the weaker choice, the comparison says so plainly.

Because affiliate links appear throughout the site, please treat any outbound link to a shop, brand, or service as potentially commercial. Full details — which networks we work with and exactly how it works — are in our Affiliate Disclosure. Our comparisons are information, not financial, investment, or purchasing advice.

Corrections and contact

We are open to your corrections and feedback. If something here is wrong, out of date, or missing, please tell us — comparisons are only worth reading if they are right. Send comments and edits to hidden.jewel.apps@gmail.com.